<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the best PHP accelerator to use?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.agilewebmasters.com/robert/what-is-the-best-php-accelerator-to-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agilewebmasters.com/robert/what-is-the-best-php-accelerator-to-use/</link>
	<description>Take the lead out...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Peled</title>
		<link>http://agilewebmasters.com/robert/what-is-the-best-php-accelerator-to-use/#comment-51309</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Peled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilewebmasters.com/?p=236#comment-51309</guid>
		<description>The only problem I have found with APC is that for extremely large sites, say 60,000 files and higher it does not work so well and latest versions are BETA with some serious memory leaks. In those cases, eAccelerator performed the best. However, by no means it is perfect. It has some issues with stability and scalability but much more solid than APC.

Let's see what the future brings us, perhaps Hiphop for PHP...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem I have found with APC is that for extremely large sites, say 60,000 files and higher it does not work so well and latest versions are BETA with some serious memory leaks. In those cases, eAccelerator performed the best. However, by no means it is perfect. It has some issues with stability and scalability but much more solid than APC.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what the future brings us, perhaps Hiphop for PHP&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

